Showing posts with label Bad Photos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bad Photos. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Remarkable Marketing


This property at 5946 Llano Ave. in Dallas was just listed by an Edwin Dolatkhah with Plugin Realty. It's priced at $209,000, which is pretty good for the area. It's also listed as a "short sale." But how about those photos, huh? I mean, nothing says "Welcome Home" more than scary pitch black photos. Amiright?

But seriously, how in the hell can any reasonably intelligent person upload those photos, knowing they will be distributed to all major real estate websites, and not think to themselves, "You know....These photos are a little on the dark side. I wonder if I should retake them?"

And then there is the person who snapped these photos. Did you even think to try a light switch or maybe open the blinds? You didn't? Okay. No. That's fine. No, no, no. Really. You did a great job. :/

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Best Use Of For Sale Sign. Ever.



This is absolutely one of my all-time favorite real estate pictures. According to my friend Sean, who sent me this picture via Facebook, this picture was taken in the Park Cities this week. So, is the house for sale or the car? I'm confused.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Proof That Pictures Can Make All The Difference



I recently listed this property at 1600 Abrams Rd. in Dallas. The "Before" pictures were taken by the Realtor that previously listed the property. The "After" photos were taken by yours truly. As you can see, great photos can turn a property from "blah" to "Wow!". Some agents simply don't take the time to snap good photos. Something I've never really understood.

It's also important to note that this home was vacant so I had the property staged. Staging is an absolute MUST in today's real estate market. However, I'm not so sure about staging a property with pets....but furniture is a definite must have. Props to Kira Sauer of Bliss by Kira for doing a great job staging this wonderful home!

Bad Real Estate Photos: Not Just For "Cheap Homes"



Lately I've been working with a large number of buyers. This translates into hours upon hours of looking through hundreds of homes - and their photos. Now, we all know there are tons of bad real estate photos out there. But what I don't understand is why sellers put up with them? Surely the owners of these homes realize the photos their agent took are terrible. One would also think bad photos simply won't be acceptable for high-end homes, right? (See the two listings below for the answer.)

I spend several hours taking professional photos of every single one of my listings, regardless of the list price. I even have special computer software that I use to process the photos and touch them up as needed. I do this because I understand the power photos have when attracting potential buyers. Yet for some reason there are still agents out there - and their sellers - who don't seem to get this. Here are some examples. Enjoy!



Loving the Casa Magnetica angle.


Kitchen is "light and bright."


More beautiful side yard. Comes complete with water hose.


We're uncertain what this photo is supposed to show us.

BAD REAL ESTATE PHOTOS BONUS: 4223 Bordeaux - $7,450,000


You would think a $7,450,000 home would have a little more, I don't know, pizazz! in the photos. Someone PLEASE help me understand how this is acceptable.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Marketing 101: How NOT to Photoshop Pictures of Your Listings



I admit that from time to time I will photoshop some pictures of my listings. You know, get rid of a few brown spots on the lawn, enhance the colors of the landscaping and grass. But the above photo is just embarrassing. Did this agent have his 6-year-old photoshop this for him?

That being said, the house in under contract. Let's just hope for the seller's sake this agent's negotiating skills are better than his/her photoshop skills.

Monday, April 12, 2010

The Onion Pokes Fun at Real Estate Agent Photos


Thanks to my friend Ken for passing this Onion article my way. Here is a link to the article and I've also copied it below. It pokes fun at the fact many Realtors put their photos on their signs, business cards and even billboards. My favorite line from the article,
"You know, in a way, I'm sort of glad Mary and I never met face-to-face. Touring the property with her assistant and conducting the negotiations over the phone really helped maintain the mystique of that wonderful, wonderful sign. I can only assume Mary's heavily made-up visage conveys an even greater degree of trust in person."
Hopefully both real estate agents and consumers will get a kick out of this. I know I did!



I Wasn't Going To Buy This House Until I Saw The Realtor's Headshot On The Sign

BY SAM CONE
MARCH 16, 2010 | ISSUE 46•11

Buying a house is one of the biggest decisions a person can make, so when I set out to purchase my first home, I didn't take the matter lightly. Sure, the place I ended up with isn't in the greatest shape, or even in the best part of town. And by any fair market estimate of its value, I certainly overpaid.

But as far as I was concerned, the deal was sealed the moment I saw real estate agent Mary T. Ellington looking back at me from that Re/Max sign, her face just barely visible over the rampant weeds growing in my new front lawn. For my money—$256,560 of it, to be exact—there's nothing like a poorly lit, oversaturated photograph to let me know that I'm working with a friend and not just someone out for an easy commission.

To be honest, I had serious reservations the first time I drove through what is now my neighborhood. I have two kids, so the lack of good schools in the area and the dangerous highway mere feet from the unfenced backyard were sources of concern. But after I passed more than half a dozen of Mary's signs in front of house after ramshackle house, I just knew that if she sold me a home I would be her No. 1 priority. And if there was any doubt left in my mind, it was immediately eradicated by the quote right below her picture: "You're my No. 1 priority!"

But the slogan was really just the icing on the cake. Seeing Mary's insincere, plastic smile and stiffly coiffed hair several times had already reassured me that I was making the right choice.

Still, I had a few lingering concerns, which is normal with any major life decision. So it's a good thing I drove past that billboard bearing the selfsame image of Mary on my way home! There's a certain level of gravitas and legitimacy that only a 30-foot-high, clumsily retouched photograph of a middle-aged woman can achieve. Text-only ads may have their flashy exclamation points, and business cards may be embossed and glossy, but I don't think any of those things could ever convince me to plunge myself and my family into insurmountable debt the way that awkward photo did.

You know, in a way, I'm sort of glad Mary and I never met face-to-face. Touring the property with her assistant and conducting the negotiations over the phone really helped maintain the mystique of that wonderful, wonderful sign. I can only assume Mary's heavily made-up visage conveys an even greater degree of trust in person.

I just wish every crucial choice in life could be guided by hastily produced visual aids! Sure, finding the very best attorney, bail bondsman, or elected representative is no more difficult than perusing the signs at a bus stop or the contents of one's mailbox. But what if I need a babysitter or a qualified psychiatrist? Or—God forbid—a funeral director?

I guess what I'm saying is that it's just such a relief when professionals take the time to demonstrate a true respect for my intelligence. By having their picture taken in front of that same sky-blue background used in all my school yearbook photos, it's clear they're trying to put an honest face on whatever transaction might transpire between us, and not at all employing some sleazy, calculated tactic they learned during a business seminar at a hotel by the airport.

The airport with a major flight path right over my new house.


Monday, November 30, 2009

New Marketing Technique Using "Artistic" Photos?



Nope. Just another poor seller who is not getting their money's worth. Or maybe they are? Either way, this is poor form and should never be acceptable to any real estate agent or their clients. At this time, there is only 1 photo. And this is the one they picked? Hopefully the seller speaks up about this.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

"Property features plenty of natural light"



Seriously? This house obviously has electricity since the breakfast room chandelier is on. How hard is it to flip a switch before taking a picture?

Someone puh-LEEZE tell me how these people's clients can possibly be happy with this type of service.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Ugliest kitchen ever?



I thought Pepto Bismol was supposed to soothe your stomach, not make you nauseous. Not only am I baffled as to why someone would paint their kitchen this color, I'm more confused as to why someone would actually buy this house. It's under contract and is severely overpriced.